Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Religion & Politics' started by KoalaRimjob, May 10, 2012.
This is Genocide
This is White Genocide
While I don't support myself marrying a minority, I can see myself impregnating a few of them, but no blacks. Still gradual breeding interbreeding, but most marriages remain within race as both are necessary to maintain healthy genetic stock.
Hear, hear. I'm against interracial marriage because it makes fucking ugly kids with notable exceptions of Rosario Dawson.
Shes pretty hawt.
@KoalaRimjob OMG, you're so edgy.
Also, that "interracial" couple contributes to the proving of the theory that the only people who commit to "interracial" relationships are those who're unwanted by their own "race."
I thought you'd talk about the slow extermination of whites in Zimbabwe under the rule of Robert Mugabe?
I can't remember where i read this but apparently White women who marry black men tend to remain on the lower end of the economic spectrum.
While white men who marry black women tend to be on the economic middle ground.
Have you never seen Halle Berry, nigger?
Fun thing is if a half white half black has kids with a white, the kids end up more white than black.
So in other words,
minorities would breed themselves out of existence or whatever.
typical politics thread
I knew I forgot somebody.
Also, my father once told me never to begrudge a black man on a college campus. He fucks all the fat chicks and the white trash that guys like me wouldn't poke with a 10 foot pole. I guess this goes The Member Formerly Known As Baya's theory that the rejects are the ones that draw another group's eye.
I was gonna mention Traci Bingham; but I guess she got plastic surgery to look like LaToya Jackson.
This reminds me of singer Robin Thicke who had a baby with his half-black wife Paula Patton. The baby came out totally white and Paula Patton then made a ridiculously racist comment in Chelsea Lately stating that people thought they "adopted a Russian baby" ( because obviously every white child is therefore a Russian child) and she wants "her baby to get more black". She even said she wanted to rub him in oil to make him tanned.
It's really weird that she expected a black baby to come out, considering she's not even black to begin with (both skin color and facial traits). And shouldn't we be happy the baby came out healthy or something... ?
Shouldn't we just be happy that it's white, and not another niglet?
For me the most annoying thing ever are these clearly mixed race people who call themselves 'black'. This is black:
These self-proclaimed 'black' people are not black:
Been there, done that
Elaborate further on this, Mr. The Member Formerly Known As Baya. I was always under the impression that "opposites attract" was a major component in interacial marriages, along with the tearing down of the social stigma related with what was once deemed an abhorrent act.
lol half niggers
It's because members of their own tribe find them repulsive. There's a creamy middle, being outside your clan but within your tribe, that reasonably preferred people get.
That said, most Americans have no tribe. But I suppose if one were to apply it to "race" then the same thing applies.
this is what genocide looks like when i do it.
Your definitions are of no use to me. I follow my definition of tribe. Family = a group of closely related individuals. Clan = a group of closely related families. Tribe = a group of closely related clans.
If all white people collectively did not care about miscentigration would that still be genocide?
It was established by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (a kangaroo court backed by the US/EU/UN) that forced sexual intercourse is a form of genocide. Since genocide is defined as the destruction of a group of people and if a form of sexual intercourse can be legally defined as genocide then there is a case to be made. It's like if a person is okay with being killed but the law states that euthanasia is illegal. It doesn't matter what people's personal convictions are, what matters is the law and how it's defined.
By definition miscegenation is a form of genocide. It's genetic assimilation. The original group/s are bred out. Depending on the circumstances, their entire culture might be destroyed as well. Again, doesn't matter if it's voluntary or benevolent or whatever.
A silent genocide?
Speaking of which, the British attempted to genetically assimilate the Aboriginal tribes in Australia in what would be rightfully called genocide. These were voluntary marital unions but it doesn't make it any less of a genocide. There are few if any pure-blooded Aborigines now and the vast majority are ignorant about their tribe's culture, most of them having to take another Aboriginal tribe's culture to compensate.
Oh and cultural assimilation has been defined as culture genocide and legally accepted as genocide. (So it's illegal under international law to assimilate immigrants to your nation.) Again, these are murky waters. Blame whoever opened the floodgates.
Then the first white Australians were traitors to the white race.
This is the stupidest shit Ive ever heard of.
One main point against all this garbage is there is NO SUCH THING as race. There is no white race or black race or anything else. It is just levels of melanin in the skin. This has been determined by scientists genetically who found that there is MORE variation and difference between individuals of the same so called 'race' than there is of two individuals from different so called races. Thats a scientific fact. Race doesnt exist.
Anyone to propose that kinda shit must be a brain dead mong.
Oh boy, this thread just gained 5 more pages.
Also; make a introduction thread.