Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by Failstation, Aug 8, 2018.
It's the rat king.
Now we need a pill that gives AIDS to fat people.
WE ALREADY HAVE THE CURE FOR CANCER BUT THE PHARMA COMPANIES ARE WITHHOLDING IT FOR PROFIT
we have already had an effective cure for most early cancers in early onset for at least twenty years
pharma won't let it out
vs SE that isnt controlled by the lizard people
A can of store bought soup with like 100 "ingredients" will cause you to shit out healthy functioning cells and give you cancer in turn.
shit it down you filthy golem
The problem comes from people thinking "cancer" is a singular thing, but it isn't. You may have a cure that is 100% effective for pancreatic cancer but it will do exactly jack shit for brain cancer. Now, if what these researchers are saying is true, than they may be able to develop a true panacea, but I don't see it being widely available for years or even decades because of bureaucratic bullshit.
According to the article it doesn't cure cancer, it gets rid of cancerous tumours. Which is absolutely a good thing since all the common techniques off the top of my head are pretty crude.
Okay, I can live with that. However, the problem still involves everyone treating cancer as a generic rather than specific term for the activity of an aberrant group of cells. The end result is, for all intents and purposes, the same, but it doesn't address the cause nor how it should be treated. There is no one "true" cancer..if so, smoking would cause all cancer, as would asbestos.
Consuming baking soda prevents cancer, that's why crack needs be legalized.
Why was step 9 repeated?
Wow, I didn't expect to learn how to make crack today, but every day is a surprise on this site, isn't it?