Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by KoalaRimjob, Apr 30, 2012.
This sicko was playing around in a dead, 82 year old cunt; he writes a paper about it, and gains international attention and the respect of his peers (well, sort of).
I, however, slide just one finger up a 25 year old one at the pub; and I get locked up for assault!!
WHERE'S THE JUSTICE????
Of course the feminazis insist that denying the existence of a g-spot is somehow oppressive to women. Feminists are the most annoying, illogical, and easily angered group of activists since fuckin' peta.
Trying to come up with a G-Spot/Holocaust joke....
Really, he couldn't just fuck the corpse like most of the necro's do? This doctor who went wrist deep in a dried up jerky cooze must have been really desperate for attention.
Corpses are best used as sexual objects by disturbed individuals,
Decorations for their play-rooms,
Hijinks that cause a killer to slaughter college seniors and David Copperfield on a train,
or for entertaining marionette, muppet, or ventriloquist shows.
Those who want to find the "female g-spot" will poke around their woman til they find it, or she fakes them out. But for most guys doing a one-nighter or "hump-and-dump" they'll pop her O-ring instead with buttsecks.
Adults really shouldn't play with dead things, unless it's for the lulz.
While searching jewish women for hidden jew-gold, nazi soldiers found many g-spots. But like most men, they didn't care...
Once you get a doctorate different set of rules then apply, especially if those you "test" on know you are a $$$doctor$$$.
they need to face the fact that reality is biased.
The female orgasm is vestigial. Women will soon evolve out of it. Sexual pleasure is the domain of the male.
Insert "guys wouldn't know a g-spot if they were holding one in their hand that came out of a dead 83-year-old whore" joke here.
It was probably just some Silly Putty.
you're assuming the ones who DON'T feel pleasure will have more children than the ones who do
Its also valid to say that a gene that serves no purpose will eventually be eliminated, and it has been shown that sexual pleasure has about 0 to do with how often a woman has sex. Don't argue population genetics with me, I have an education.
whether or not it's useful has nothing to do with it, whether or not the organisms carrying it reproduce does.
So wait the G-spot isn't the visible/exposed clitoris? I was always confused why people denied the existence of the clitoris. It makes a lot more sense now.
Ok pumpkin, thats 8th grade evolutionary biology. You don't know about drift and evolution on the level of the gene instead of the species so STFU.
I always thought feminists were at the forefront of g-spot deniers.
The idea behind it is that they think all sexual action for women comes from the clit. Freud rightly derided women who could only achieve clitoral orgasms as childish. Feminists hate being penetrated at all, and if they must be, they at least want the man to believe that they aren't getting any pleasure out of it because there's *no* clitoral stimulation.
If there's a g-spot that means those dumb wildebeests will have to stop bitching that penetration doesn't do anything for them and demanding other stuff in lieu of orgasms while simultaneously admitting they have the psyche of spoiled little girls [truth.]
Edit: * added for emphasis and debatability
Wrong, feminists like being penetrated, but they want to be on top.
Oh come on, we all know female orgasms are a myth.
They're not a myth.
They're what women do when they're bored/sore/tired and they want you to stop.
They called them "orgasms" because "get the fuck off me, you sweaty pig" was too long.