Persecution and the Art of Writing and the Future of the Series of Tubes

Discussion in 'Science & Technology' started by GSTalbert1, Aug 28, 2013.

Encyclopedia Dramatica Forums
A very friendly community
  1. GSTalbert1

    GSTalbert1
    Expand Collapse
    Girlvinyl

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Messages:
    6,754
    Occupation:
    Part Time Substitute Teacher Full time Teal Deer
    An exoteric book contains then two teachings: a popular teaching of an edifying character, which is in the foreground; and a philosophic teaching concerning the most important subject, which is indicated only between the lines. This is not to deny that some great writers might have stated certain important truths quite openly by using as mouthpiece some disreputable character: they would thus show how much they disapproved of pronouncing the truths in question. There would then be good reason for our finding in the greatest literature of the past so many interesting devils, madmen, beggars, sophists, drunkards, epicureans and buffoons. Those to whom such books are truly addressed are, however, neither the unphilosophic majority nor the perfect philosopher as such, but the young men who might become philosophers: the potential philosophers are to be led step by step from the popular views which are indispensable for all practical and political purposes to the truth which is merely and purely theoretical, guided by certain obtrusively enigmatic features in the presentation of the popular teaching - obscurity of the plan, contradictions, pseudonyms, inexact repetitions of earlier statements, strange expressions, etc. Such features do not disturb the slumber of those who cannot see the wood for the trees, but act as awakening stumbling blocks for those who can. All books of that kind owe their existence to the love of the mature philosopher for the puppies (1) of his race, by whom he wants to be loved in turn: all exoteric books are "written speeches caused by love."

    Exoteric literature presupposes that there are basic truths which would not be pronounced in public by any decent man, because they would do harm to many people who, having been hurt, would naturally be inclined to hurt in turn him who pronounces the unpleasant truths.

    It presupposes, in other words, that freedom of inquiry, and of publication of all results of inquiry, is not guaranteed as a basic right. This literature is then essentially related to a society which is not liberal. Thus one may very well raise the question of what use it could be in a truly liberal society. The answer is simple. In Plato's Banquet, Alcibiades— that outspoken son of outspoken Athens— compares Socrates and his speeches to certain sculptures which are very ugly from the outside, but within have most beautiful images of things divine. The works of the great writers of the past are very beautiful even from without. And yet their visible beauty is sheer ugliness, compared with the beauty of those hidden treasures which disclose themselves only after very long, never easy, but always pleasant work. This always difficult but always pleasant work is, I believe, what the philosophers had in mind when they recommended education. Education, they felt, is the only answer to the always pressing question, to the political question par excellence, of how to reconcile order which is not oppression with freedom which is not license.

    1 Compare Plato, Republic, 539 a5-di, with Apology of Socrates, 23 C2-8.
     
  2. chops

    chops
    Expand Collapse
    Dramacrat

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2012
    Messages:
    203
    Occupation:
    Boss Nigga
    Obama gave blow jobs to white limo drivers, dumbass
     
  3. Beefcake

    Beefcake
    Expand Collapse
    Best-selling author

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,302
    What the fuck does this shit have to do with computers or tech?