Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by uberfukken, Jan 17, 2017.
Pretty sure the tranny will conveniently commit suicide shortly after Assange turns himself in.
I dont get why people fall for this shit. Treason is Treason, you dont just walk away from that
This goes for Snowden too, he is going to stay in Russia because he knows full well that no matter what the government says he is dead the moment he sets foot on US soil
Pardon is an absolution and the consequences of the crime are negated.
Parole is release from incarceration; all penalties still apply.
A team of psychoanalysts working on it around the clock would reach the same conclusion anyone with any sense would in 5 minutes: Manning is one fucked up faggot.
You know that Army thing --- sorta limited his venues of escape. I'm sure Bradley "Faggot Traitor" Manning would have left for some South Asian boy brothel if given half a chance and a 20 dollar ticket in a cargo ship's hold.
Manning didn't get a pardon, his sentence got commuted from 35 to 7. All that happened was instead of being eligible for parole next year, he gets released in 4 months. Big whoop.
Assange will wait 3 days. Then he'll be extradited to the US to receive a congressional medal of freedom or whatever the fuck from Trump.
Assange is sticking to his guns.
Now there's the little part where the US has never asked for him to be extradited. He's only wanted in Sweden. Ball is in Trump's court.
There are a couple of options here
Let him walk: gives people the impression that you can leak US military data and be rewarded for it
Give him to Sweden: pointless
Be arrested and held in a US prison/Aus prison/Guantanamo: this is moderately likely especially as they have also leaked Australian classified info
Or he commits suicide by shooting himself twice in the back of the head
So you state one of Wikileaks' mission goals yet completely miss the issue that Wikileaks was manipulated by Russia, a corrupt oligarch state, to be a proxy information dump for them to embarrass the Clinton campaign during the election.
Where's your evidence that Wikileaks (or anything for that matter) is manipulated by Russia?
Why did you purposely ignore my question earlier?
Would you prefer to be uninformed or informed by someone who may be getting their facts from Russia? which is still unproven btw
Snowden used espionage tradecraft to gain information he had no access to. He knew exactly what he was doing when he got it. He also has been very selective on what he releases, never information that he had on China and Russia. He is basically embarrassing the US to NATO countries, e.g. Germany.
Manning on the other hand saw a video where an Apache helicopter a couple hundred feet in the air gunned up some AP reporters that were interviewing insurgents. The US Army investigated it and cleared the air crew of wrong doing because AP was at the wrong place at the wrong time and looked like insurgents on a four inch black and white CRT screen in the gunner's controls. Unstable Manning saw the video and felt the US was unjust in this situation so he went and grabbed whatever he could and blindly released it to Wikileaks.
Snowden is way more calculating and manipulative then Manning was and there has to be an ulterior motive with him.
but only david icke has declassified the reptoids secret rituals and bases
i wonder why hes not in jail
It was clear we weren't going to convince each other of anything and that sooner or later I would of pulled a Gretchen and refer to ad hominem attacks.
The point is you aren't an underdog freedom of information organization when you have a manipulative world power feeding you their intel to make another country look like shit. This is about Wikileaks being nonpartisan and independent and clearly they are nothing more than opportunistic amateurs. While the FBI and CIA have not yet released their report they managed to convince Trump that Russia had a hand in this. My money is on Russia based on these revelations.
I didnt realise such a simple question was so hard to answer
Bet he goes back to being a dude the minute he's no longer in prison.
You never did tell us how Putin's balls taste.
No embassy will have him.
Because the question isn't really relevant to the issue but I'll humor you. Yes it was nice getting the truth about the DNC from the Russians but this begs the question of why. Why did they do it and use Wikileaks to present it as opposed to themselves?
Russia clearly had a motive to undermine Obama and Clinton with deteriorating peace conditions between the US and themselves. They didn't want a strong Clinton administration (I don't believe they felt Trump would win and is probably a wildcard in their opinion, better than Clinton though) releasing these emails would of eroded public support for Clinton and exacerbate current domestic issues so her administration couldn't pursue a hawkish foreign policy in areas of interest for the Russians. Clearly they needed Wikileaks as a front to release info so the information would get digested and keep the Russian agenda under wraps. They didn't release the emails for the good of the American people, they didn't give a shit about them, they cared about themselves.
You do realize that hasn't been proven yet right?
Trump of all people believes it now. It's an increasingly unteneable position to say otherwise.
He said it MAY have come from Russia, china, or some 14 year old with nothing to do. Even if he did believe that, thats not a substitute for a smoking gun, which has yet to be produced.
"As far as hacking, I think it was Russia" - Trump
That's not "may have", he read the intelligence report and has the belief that it was them.
Fair enough, but note how he didnt indict putin or the russian government. And as I said before, it doesn't really matter what he believes, without the smoking gun we cant label it as fact, only skepiticism.
Right, all I have posted is conjecture, albeit informed in some cases but it makes the most sense. But it should be clear that Wikileaks got used by the Russians and Assange didn't know it at the time.
Im not denying the possibility, but I feel like were focusing too much on the act, and not on the result. After all if so much shady shit weren't happening in Hillarys camp the hacks wouldve been useless.
And Assange pussies out over a technicality. Also the sky is still blue.