I've been trying to think of a way to come up with something that would make ED punditry interesting and that would be the numerous and diverse commentary on issues or events. That we all would respond to a story from the perspective of our ideology. While I want these experiments to generally encourage intellectual discussion, we are ED, we do need to be funny. [in character] http://rt.com/news/russia-moon-program-leak-502/ And people thought that Newt Gingrich was insane for his moonbase and I say "Nay!" People accuse the Republicans for being fascists and I couldn't be more reactionary. The only idea I like of his was his moonbase. If I was told that I could only vote on a single issue, I would make it the moonbase and waste my vote on Gingrich. Which is sad because I was going to waste it on Ron Paul, and before that Jon Huntsman. [out character] Then I am unsure how it should work next. Should individual EDitors make a single comment to an article-thread or should dialogue be encouraged between EDitors and regular readers? I've been reading the comments on various sites and they are like little debates and I thought we could do something like that, but focus on that with "personas."