Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by MrGask, Jan 21, 2012.
Balls Deep: http://news.yahoo.com/g-spot-science-cant-60-years-study-says-155202501.html
Tell that to Dan Savage...
I found it, works like a charm most of the times...
The real G spot is in her ass.
WOW! Is this real? I don't think I believe this shit LOL
I don't know why people in here and on the article are like "OMFG THESE SCIENTISTS ARE SOOOOO WRONG!!!!" I find it unlikely that these scientists, who probably had a great deal of funding for this project, did something wrong or didn't explore all avenues (though I am pretty sure they didn't stick it in her pooper).
While I am not a scientist, just a humble doctor, I imagine that there is no such thing as a G-spot. What it really is that multiple stimulation to various parts of the body, not including to the , that all adds up as pleasure in the brain. I imagine an emotional connection to the person the woman is having sex with helps significantly in this (though it is not required).
for "people" u mean wordofwhore?
Well yes her and the people who commented on the actual article
Anyways, u know, denying the existence of the G-spot is denying the sexuality of the Cosmo woman, amrite?
Don't let facts ruin the political correctness of today...
by the way have been meaning to ask you what did you major in to get your doctorate?
The female orgasm is vestigial, that's the conlusion most scientists have come to. Whether or not a woman has an orgasm statistically does not affect the amount of sex she has, so pretty soon women will be completely incapable of orgasm, which I think is good.
not exactly, if, as you say, the number of orgasms a woman has is completely independent of how often she reproduces, then the number of female offspring who inherit the ability to have orgasms would be based on how often the women who DO have orgasms reproduce, which, since the statistics are independent, should be an approximately average quantity.
something like that anyway, I know what I mean, I just don't remember the right words to say it.
I really don't think women should be allowed orgasms, I support female circumcision without anesthesia
why shouldn't they be allowed orgasms? it's more interesting if they have them
no its not, not at all, its more interesting if they are crying and sobbing.
that... explains way more about you than I wanted to know
that was also my 2000th post.
It was said that his e-peen grew 3 sizes this day.
I like this study.
It makes me feel better about women weeping after sex with me, and saying things like "You are the most unsatisfying thing I've experienced since the finale of Lost" or "Your revolts me, and I want to kill myself for letting you talk me into violating my pubic mound".
I think we should commission more studies like this.
The clitoris is wishbone shaped and can be stimulated from inside the pussy. women who practice kegel exercises have more pussy orgasms because of this.
the graphic is broken.
WHAT'S THE STORY WISHBONE? Doo doo doo doo.... Doop Doop....
i know its true. this is the ONLY thing that ever makes women orgasm.
All my orgasms with dudes are clitoral, I'm not surprised about this study.
YOU CALLING ME A LIAR?
Haha I posted and did not see your post. I'm sorry, I can't call Wishbone a liar. Look at that cute lil face!
WISHBONE AINT NOONE TO FUCK WITH
His paw that is pulling back the arrow has got to be at some crazy ass angle to do that. BUT HE CAN DO ANYTHING HE IS WISHBONE
including making a wish