“Yesterday at 2pm, CNBC acts as the only mainstream news outlet to upload a release over a new lawsuit claiming evidence of the Federal government and top US banks colluding to launder 43 trillion dollars, enough to pay off the entire US debt almost 3 times over. http://www.cnbc.com/id/49555671/ 3 and a half hours later that same day (reported on today), the daughters of the executive of CNBC’s digital division (read: their website) are both killed by the family's nanny who was supposedly “a very nice woman”, “very religious”, and “has always been very, very stable”. http://www.kvue.com/news/176007461.html" 1: An article appeared on the 25th of October on CNBC implicating top ranking members of banks, government and the Federal Reserve in the unscrupulous theft of 43 trillion dollars from Americans over the past decade. 2: Three and a half hours later the children of the director responsible for CNBC's website are murdered, allegedly by their nanny with no known history of violence or anything of the sort. The story has changed as time progresses. Now allow me to continue with some musings, conjecture if you will. If you accept that there are those out there with no moral qualms whatsoever, you can then accept that they would be willing to use morality to their advantage. "Liberalism" and all of it's inherent rhetoric is essentially an argument for social responsibility and moral culpability, although invariably there are issues which will not be accepted by all, but will nonetheless gain traction among a vast segment of the population, as with abortion. Now then. Considering this, it is entirely plausible that a group which has been controlling the system and swaying popular opinion whichever way they desire for a long time has become very good at it. Blackmail defamation, targeted killings and burying everything in shit flinging serves to quell opinions which they do not desire. So, I leave it to you, my fellow EDiots: Unfortunate timing of a related tragedy, or a clear and present cover up?
There is no such thing as coincidences in political events. Coincidences are nothing more than parts of a larger conspiracy.
@Stormtrooper Let me get this straight. You think an impossibly wealthy group of individuals just ordered the killing of two children in order to send a message to their father and the rest of the world... and you want to draw their attention?
Because this group is going to use their resources on a target that will have no strategic purpose towards their objective of terror and intimidation.
They know what's coming and would kill to stop it. The game they are playing is for keeps and shit just got real. That was an act of war committed by God knows what.
Calm your tits, alright? Shit like this is common in a mob war. Well, not really. Criminals usually have a code in order to prevent retaliations from turning into family feuds. But still, such callousness is to be expected when dealing with people who've extorted or conned others out of billions of dollars, let alone (supposedly) trillions.
When you are conning tens of millions of people out of their money, the only regulation that exists is not to get caught because an angry mob will murder you if you are exposed.
They're not fucking with private citizens, they're fucking with nation states. Big, big, big fucking difference. This, if it's as serious as these news outlets claim, is going to be treated in a similar manner as Osama. Try billions of people, and the ones being conned out of their wealth are nations. I am having a hard time getting into this because this seems like the biggest story of the year and not a cover page seems to show it.
The mainstream media is owned by these people, if they get out of line, people get fired or their kids get murdered. The only way this problem is going to be dealt with is with violent revolution, French style. Innocents will suffer, sure, but sometimes you have to cut away healthy tissue to remove the cancer.
Pfft. I'll be ok. I doubt I'm top on their list of priorities. Somebodies knocking on my door though, brb.
Which is why the murder of two children seems odd. It gather way too much attention. But I guess it's worth it, for them, if it shuts everybody in the mainstream media up. I'm sure that editor thought he was infallible as well.
Yeah. The MSN media, from top to bottom, are a bunch of cowardly cunts. No sense of honour, decency or selflessness yet they try to pass themselves off as protectors of society, men of virtue and otherwise heroes. Complete hypocrites. Hopefully Wikileaks and other de facto news websites get involved.
.gif)
