Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by Groyper Supreme, Jun 26, 2019.
A faggot's self-aggrandizement
What do you expect, this guy wants a free ride from handouts from the media, He will do anything to stay in the public limelight and stay relevant.
Oh and his dad is a fucking fed.
Hol'up,ain't that the bitch that tried to use a school shooting to make himself look better?
Almost as bad as a nigger.
Don't know about THE bitch, but he is definitely one of them. Add in nearly every democrat in congress, and you have the shit show that is the rabid anti gun faction in the U.S.
i hope whoever kills him does it slowly with a wooden spoon to prove something about intent over tool.
Nah beating him to an inch away from death would be far better.Why end his suffering when you can prolong it?
i dont know, i dont find him important whatsoever to anything.
i dont want him dead or injured or anything like that, but i couldnt blame anyone for it.
i think his opinions are retarded but hes hardly a threat to anything.
at worst hes making people hate him enough to turn more pro-gun.
its the pistacho-cortez effect. sabotaging your own viewpoint through stupidity.
Good luck trying to convince white Americans to give up their guns while you openly conspire against them, Democrats.
I’m not agreeing or disagreeing with him, but I am of the mindset that SOME people are TOO STUPID to own certain types of guns.
If they're too stupid to own certain types of guns, they're too stupid to own any. Give them a water pistol and they'll shoot a stream directly into an outlet simply because they can.
That would be best, but if you give some people an inch then they will take a mile, like Mr Hogg there. I’d say first limit the types of guns available to certain people and see if the incident reports improve, then move on from there.
For instance, the guy with $100000 in assets & savings and a wife & kids is less likely to go shoot up a Waffle House with his new assault rifle than the unmarried guy living alone in the woods/desert with less than $1000 in his bank account/stashed under his floor boards
I mean that's basically the Democrat platform: Outlaw guns for everyone just because niggers and kikes are too violent.
And that's the most generous interpretation of their stance.
I think Hogg has the only truly punchable face I've ever seen.
Facts are truly a foreign concept in SJW mindsets
i think all the campaigners should have to come out in joker facepaint
the only democrat id vote for his hillary clinton just because im convinced shes some kind of lizard demon for real.
that would be pretty cool.
i was basically cool either way when it came to 2016
I said ‘CERTAIN’ guns, fatass. People should be REQUIRED to provide a detailed essay on WHY they feel the need to own a military-grade rifle/weapon to be eligible to purchase one. The essay will also reveal their intelligence, rationality & mental stability (or lack thereof) among other things as well.
Yes I'm sure this won't be abused. You fucking retard.
youre breathtakingly retarded.
Please tell me why a rule such as that to keep a drug-fueled burnout with nothing to live for, such as yourself, from acquiring an assault rifle would be a bad thing? And yes there should also be an interview with a government official and background investigation, as well.
Same question goes to you too, lardass
STFU freedom hater
youre in no position to throw ad hominems at anyone.
Why should a drug user be able to own an military-grade assault rifle in the US?
did you read the part where i said "you are breathtakingly retarded"
because that said everything i needed it to already.
It’s obvious you can’t answer the question; and I doubt anyone else could either. It seems that the only non-military people in the US who desire to own military-grade assault rifles are people of unsound mind. No rational person would ever try to justify military-grade weaponry in the hands of a civilian.
are you trolling or do you really lack the self awareness to know how retarded you are.
Well, if the guy in the deset only has $1000 dollars, he doesn't own an assault rifle. He wouldn't be able to afford the ATF fees for one, and anything that is capable of full auto fire requires not only those hoops to be jumped through but a hefty amount of cash as well, if you can even find one for sale. Besides, the majority of "mass shootings" (an FBI term meaning two or more people being shot) are committed with handguns. Additionally, the AR15 which seems to give you such a hate boner is not, repeat NOT a military grade weapon. No army in the world issues it as a standard weapon. Finally, there should not ever be any essay as to why any law-abiding citizen feels the need to own any weapon. I have the right to do so, regardless of what any leftist might think.
I'd add Rachel Maddow, Tim Heidecker, Eric Warheim, George Soros, Shaun King, and this stupid sonofabitch:
The gun semantics argument is tiresome. I can’t believe pro-gun activists continue to use it. The Christchurch shooter used an AR-15 style rifle and 2 non-military grade SMGs. Do you really think he would’ve been able to shoot over 100 people & kill 51 of them in 6 mins with just handguns?
Face reality, man. There's isn’t a logical reason for civilians to own machine guns. Being unconstitutional is just an excuse because sub-machine guns, assault rifles & high-capacity guns didn’t exist when the constitution was written.