Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News' started by chalch, Aug 2, 2013.
So porn is ok as long as it depicts children.
Ah, Christian kid's show hosts. I always thought most of them were secret ultra perverts. (except David Liebe Hart, he's just awesome.)
This belongs in News
First pastor G and now this Oh wait I don't give a fuckedy fuck oint:
Wow, I never saw that coming.
There is no god.
There might be a god or there might not be; the poor bastard ain't decided yet.
Even when there is one, he would be to ashamed to show himself.
In fact, I think he hates humans
Christians are all the same
Aw, I thought he actually ate children. That would've been more interesting.
Yes, there is. We play checkers every Tuesday around four.
@uberfukken @oddguy @ whoever else
I did -
Christians belong to a cannibal zombie cult, this shit is bound to happen.
What the fuck is this? He told children pornography was wrong and got away with it? And then got convicted for THINKING ABOUT eating a child? This would be like if Hitler got away with killing 20 million people and then got sent to jail for a parking ticket. American justice at its finest.
Why don't you have a fagtag anymore? @uberfukken @Atomic Joe
That part wasn't a crime. It's extremely common for parents to teach their children that pornography is wrong, in case if you've been living under a rock.
No one was actually harmed. That's the difference.
God, i wish they would make a fake satirical children's christian show
where the host is a perverted pedo cannibal puppeteer.
that's not illegal
he was convicted for possesion of child pornography
Indoctrination, IMO, should be illegal. What he had been doing for years, was morally reprehensible. He was teaching children to go against their natural urges and feelings, and generally being a cunt. Tell me: How is it even hurting anyone if he merely possessed child pornography? The emphasis of his conviction was misplaced. My post was more of a rant about the laws in place rather than about the competence of the justice system itself.
he's going to get his anus destroyed in prison.
So he never actually did it?
I like you.
Yeah, dude. We should like, totally remove bans on possession of child pornography. Sure, the makers be in jail but at least their customers won't be discouraged from continuing to buy child prons.
For child pornography to exist, some poor kid(s) out there has to suffer. They don't get boned by a bunch of old dudes and think, "Shit, man, this is fucking awesome!". It's psychologically damaging for kids and can often be physically damaging even if they are not intentionally treated roughly. Kids practically never willingly get involved in the sex industry. If they do, it's because they don't understand the ramifications of that decision. Many are forced into the industry in desperation for money (which sometimes happens in developing nations--some children will engage in sexual activity with tourists in exchange for money) and some are kidnapped from a young age or groomed into it.
The person with the child porn may not have personally harmed a child, but laws like this are in place for many reasons and part of it is to discourage people from buying it. If child pron owners get the same or a similar sentence to child pron makers, many potential buyers think twice about getting it.
I was expecting to hear he already ate some.
Ikr, fucking disapointing