Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Religion & Politics' started by Baya Rae 4900, Mar 5, 2012.
Yeah,I though of that too.
if we as a society allow abortions we must allow the killing of newborns as well.
in essence it's the same thing.
Dont agree, as much i feel like dashing my offsprings head against a wall i dont think i must be allowed to do it.
If a gross mutant was forming in my stomach i would however eradicate it
You can just drop the eggs out of the nest before they hatch.
I like to do cheesey baby omlette, scrumdidlyumptious
I'm not liking that post because you already have enough likes.
I can never get enough.
I must keep Zaiger from catching up to me.
This is relevant to my interest
this lasted long time in the discussioning of content
Under what age is an unwanted mutation of cells be disposable? 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years? Why that age?
Lets go for an even 2 months - kidney bean sized so easy peasey to pass
How should the cluster of cells be killed? Flushed out with extra hormones? I dunno not medically inclined
a.Should a cluster of unwanted cells be killed only if it is abnormal? no
b.Should all abnormal cells be condemned to unlive? yes
c.What degree of abnormality would mark the cells for termination ? non quality of life - depends on your view, horrendous pain thoughout life , inoperable conditions etc etc
Should any child who is a burden or nuisance to its parents be destroyed? - is it born yet or just being inconvient in the womb- clarify
Should the parents alone have the right to decide on the child’s elimination? yes
What if they disagree with each other ? tuff luck really- but then the ole mentally competant to make decisions comes into play.
Since the welfare state supports the lives of the people, would it also be right for the state to kill those it no longer chooses to support? If so, on what grounds would this be justified – age, physical health, deformity, mental health, political activity, political opinion, general non-conformism, unpopularity, any?
If the undesirables are not born there wont be a problem
At what level of government should such a decision be taken, and should it be taken by a single bureaucrat or a committee?
Lets have a republic just like plato
What method of killing should the state use? chemical hormone flush again prior to life
Should the organs of parent- or state-condemned children/citizens be regularly harvested for transplant? Should children/citizens be killed in order that their organs may be harvested? yes if your ewan macgregor
Would it be acceptable for freshly killed people to be eaten? Should human meat be sold by butchers? Only if your on a mountain and have run out of chocolate and wine
There's enough unwanted people in the world. Mothers should be allowed to kill anything under their care without fear of retribution.
I'm not touching this shit.
Abortions should be illegal. The fetus could have been a person.
Menstruation should be illegal. The egg could have been a fetus.
It's pretty black and white.
Don't forget masturbation.
I would also like it legal to be allowed to kill 21 year old jackoffs who piss me off. But that's another story. In all, aforementioned killing living humans just because they can't take care of themselves is really a step backwards. If babies are to be killed for being unable to provide for themselves or certain mutations, then the fatties, midgets, retards and people that are just plain ugly are next. What is the difference between an unborn baby who maybe leeches off a mother, compared to an unemployed fatty who leeches of the government for some "disability/unemployment". So, in end Fuck your thread Snorlax. Your thread sucks, like your mom sucks my dick.
I feel like I'm watching an episode of "When Mexicans Attack".
Babies should be killed at the whim of the parent(s), which is the whole fucking point of the article, you illiterate gun-toting bean eater.
If we can extend that to other leeches, then fucking brilliant.
I don't know if I missed your point, but fuck you anyway.
Now, thanks to you, I feel like Mexican food; and I'm on the wrong fucking side of the world to get any.
Am i the only person who thinks this is disturbing?
I mean, fine if its just a clusterfuck of cells.
but a newborn?
30th trimester abortions ftw.
Didn't bother to read my post didn't you.
I've had a change of heart. The infant is basically the parents property, so the parent should have every right to kill it. No one would complain if the parent disposed of their microwave, or their xbox, or whatever, why should they be prosecuted for disposing of their infants?
Stop fucking spying on me.
I'm pretty happy with my tan, though.
I support this. Killing handicapped, retarded or deformed people could be seen as eugenics, which is beneficial to the human race, and a dead baby is better than an unwanted one who will be a burden on society and the government like anyone with a disability, mental retardation or a deformity, and will probably grow up to be an abuser, a criminal or a sex offender.
That said, I support a mandatory culling of homosexuals (and their kids who will grow up to be fags or dykes) and purging them from the annals of history and pop-culture.
@Drmusic2010, Chris-chan, Aeverine Nieves, Brian Peppers and Kevin Havens should have been killed at birth.
I actually want to see ED hook Dr.Music and Chris up together and see what kind of monster they'll produce. They would prolly name it after an animu character and would look similar to this:
lol, it cracks me up that pro-lifers are disturbed and offended by this. They're all in denial. If they think it's okay to scramble a babies' brain while it's still in their body, why should it be any different to them if it's outside of their body? As a matter of fact, as long as we're following this train of thought, and if children really are a parent's property, then a parent should be able to legally kill or destroy their child until they are a legal adult, right? Honestly, all in or all out, you can't have it both ways.
Mariana and Chris-chan couldn't agree on a name, Mariana would want to name the baby Andria if it was a girl or John (after John Candy) if it was a boy (great names aside from being raped by the werejohncandy), CWC would pick something dumb like Naruko/Naruto, Sakura, Akira or Ichiro. The baby would be a fugly, abused, malnourished mess.